← All U.S. Congress bills

HB4090Introduced in the House

Critical Mineral Dominance Act

EngrossedSenate Energy And Natural Resources

Introduced by Pete Stauber, District MN-8

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Checking for a plain-English summary…

Official description

To codify certain provisions of certain Executive Orders relating to domestic mining and hardrock mineral resources, and for other purposes.

Where it stands

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.

July 15, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: On Passage RC# 55 · February 4, 2026

224

Yes

195

No

13

Absent or Not Voting

432 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Nicholas BegichAKYes
Barry MooreAL-2Yes
Shomari FiguresAL-2No
Mike D. RogersAL-3Yes
Robert AderholtAL-4Yes
Dale StrongAL-5Yes
Gary PalmerAL-6Yes
Terri SewellAL-7No
Eric CrawfordAR-1Yes
French HillAR-2Yes

Bill history

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.

  4. Subcommittee Hearings Held

  5. Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Discharged

  6. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  7. Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 16.

  8. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-387.

  9. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 337.

  10. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1032 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090. The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 7148. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 4090.

  11. Rule H. Res. 1032 passed House.

  12. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1032. (consideration: CR H1993-2002)

  13. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090. The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 7148. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 4090.

  14. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 4090.

  15. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  16. Ms. Leger Fernandez moved to recommit to the Committee on Natural Resources. (text: CR H2002)

  17. The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.

  18. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 4090, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Leger Fernandez demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  19. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2009-2010)

  20. On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 212 (Roll no. 54).

  21. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 224 - 195 (Roll no. 55). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H1994)

  22. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  23. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

  24. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.