← All U.S. Congress bills

HB4690Introduced in the House

Reliable Federal Infrastructure Act

EngrossedSenate Environment And Public Works

Introduced by Nicholas Langworthy, District NY-23

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Checking for a plain-English summary…

Official description

To amend the Energy Conservation and Production Act to repeal certain Federal building energy efficiency performance standards, and for other purposes.

Where it stands

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

April 27, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: On Passage RC# 134 · April 22, 2026

215

Yes

202

No

13

Absent or Not Voting

430 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Nicholas BegichAKYes
Barry MooreAL-2Yes
Shomari FiguresAL-2No
Mike D. RogersAL-3Yes
Robert AderholtAL-4Yes
Dale StrongAL-5Yes
Gary PalmerAL-6Yes
Terri SewellAL-7No
Eric CrawfordAR-1Yes
French HillAR-2Yes

Bill history

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

  3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy.

  4. Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

  5. Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  6. Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 14.

  7. Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

  8. Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 27 - 21.

  9. Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-483, Part I.

  10. Committee on Transportation discharged.

  11. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 413.

  12. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1189 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897 and H.R. 5587. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 4690, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587.

  13. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1189. (consideration: CR H3057-3061)

  14. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897 and H.R. 5587. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4690, H. Res. 1182, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 4690, H.R. 1897, and H.R. 5587.

  15. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 4690.

  16. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

  17. Mrs. Sykes moved to recommit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce. (CR H3061)

  18. The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.

  19. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 4690, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mrs. Sykes demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  20. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3062-3064)

  21. On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 203 - 214 (Roll no. 133).

  22. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 202 (Roll no. 134). (text: CR H3057)

  23. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  24. Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.