HCR86Introduced in the House
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Introduced by Gregory Meeks, District NY-5
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Checking for a plain-English summary…
Official description
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Where it stands
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
June 24, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
Senate votes
1 recorded vote · each counted separately
SenateStage: On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 86 RC# 184 · June 23, 2026
50
Yes
48
No
2
Absent or Not Voting
100 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Banks | IN-3 | No |
| Lisa Murkowski | AK | Yes |
| Dan Sullivan | AK | No |
| Tommy Tuberville | AL | No |
| Katie Boyd Britt | AL | No |
| John Boozman | AR | No |
| Tom Cotton | AR | No |
| Ruben Gallego | AZ | Yes |
| Mark Kelly | AZ | Yes |
| Adam Schiff | CA | Yes |
Bill history
Submitted in House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
ORDER OF PROCEDURE - Mr. Mast asked unanimous consent that, it be in order at any time to consider H. Con. Res.86 in the House if called up by the chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs or his designee; that the concurrent resolution be considered as read; and that the previous question be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution without intervening motion except for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by Representative Mast of Florida and Representative Meeks of New York, or their respective designees. Agreed to without objection.
Consideration initiated pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H3647-3648)
Considered pursuant to a previous order. (consideration: CR H3648-3652; text: CR H3648)
DEBATE - Pursuant to a previous order, the House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 86.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Con. Res. 86, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the concurrent resolution and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Mr. Meeks demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Mr. Issa asked unanimous consent That, notwithstanding clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings on the vote by the yeas and nays on the question of adoption of H. Con. Res. 86, may be postponed until the legislative day of June 3, 2026. Agreed to without objection.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3812-3813)
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 215 - 208 (Roll no. 199).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations discharged pursuant to the order of 06/18/2026.
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 48. Record Vote Number: 184. (consideration: CR S3039-3040)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.