← All U.S. Congress bills

HR1032Introduced in the House

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 7148) making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 142) disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4090) to codify certain provisions of certain Executive Orders relating to domestic mining and hardrock mineral resources, and for other purposes.

Introduced

Introduced by Brian Jack, District GA-3

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Checking for a plain-English summary…

Official description

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 7148) making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 142) disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4090) to codify certain provisions of certain Executive Orders relating to domestic mining and hardrock mineral resources, and for other purposes.

Where it stands

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

February 3, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: On Agreeing to the Resolution RC# 52 · February 3, 2026

217

Yes

215

No

0

Absent or Not Voting

432 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Nicholas BegichAKYes
Barry MooreAL-2Yes
Shomari FiguresAL-2No
Mike D. RogersAL-3Yes
Robert AderholtAL-4Yes
Dale StrongAL-5Yes
Gary PalmerAL-6Yes
Terri SewellAL-7No
Eric CrawfordAR-1Yes
French HillAR-2Yes

Bill history

  1. The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-478, by Mr. Jack.

  2. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 59.

  3. The resolution provides for consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 7148. Also, the resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 142 and H.R. 4090 under a closed rule and provides for one motion to recommit H.R. 4090.

  4. Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1951-1959)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1032.

  6. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 1032, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  7. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1959-1960)

  8. On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 210 (Roll no. 51). (consideration: CR H1959-1960)

  9. On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 215 (Roll no. 52). (text: CR H1951-1952)

  10. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.