← All U.S. Congress bills

HR1336Introduced in the House

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Introduced

Introduced by Virginia Foxx, District NC-5

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Checking for a plain-English summary…

Official description

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

Where it stands

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

June 4, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

HouseStage: On Agreeing to the Resolution RC# 203 · June 4, 2026

213

Yes

211

No

6

Absent or Not Voting

430 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each representative voted

RepresentativeDistrictVote
Nicholas BegichAKYes
Barry MooreAL-2Yes
Shomari FiguresAL-2No
Mike D. RogersAL-3Yes
Robert AderholtAL-4Yes
Dale StrongAL-5Yes
Gary PalmerAL-6Yes
Terri SewellAL-7No
Eric CrawfordAR-1Yes
French HillAR-2Yes

Bill history

  1. The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-685, by Ms. Foxx.

  2. The resolution waives a requirement of clause 6(a) of Rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

  3. Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 78.

  4. Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H3862-3865)

  5. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 1336.

  6. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res 1336, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.

  7. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3873-3875)

  8. On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 212 - 210 (Roll no. 202).

  9. On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 203). (text: CR H3862)

  10. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.