HR436Introduced in the House
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
Introduced by Erin Houchin, District IN-9
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Checking for a plain-English summary…
Official description
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14.
Where it stands
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
May 22, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
HouseStage: On Agreeing to the Resolution RC# 142 · May 22, 2025
217
Yes
212
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
432 representatives recorded in this House vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each representative voted
| Representative | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Nicholas Begich | AK | Yes |
| Barry Moore | AL-2 | Yes |
| Shomari Figures | AL-2 | No |
| Mike D. Rogers | AL-3 | Yes |
| Robert Aderholt | AL-4 | Yes |
| Dale Strong | AL-5 | Yes |
| Gary Palmer | AL-6 | Yes |
| Terri Sewell | AL-7 | No |
| Eric Crawford | AR-1 | Yes |
| French Hill | AR-2 | Yes |
Bill history
The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-113, by Mrs. Houchin.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 29.
The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1 under a closed rule with two hours of general debate and one motion to recommit.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2220-2235)
By direction of the Committee on Rules, Mrs. Houchin called up H.Res. 436 and asked for its immediate consideration.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. McGovern raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 436 on the grounds that the resolution violates section 9(c) of the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 436. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration of the resolution.
Mr. McGovern moved on consideration of the resolution.
On consideration of the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 211 (Roll no. 139).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
POINT OF ORDER - Mr. McGovern raised a point of order against the provisions of H. Res. 436 on the grounds that the resolution violates section 426(a) of the Congressional Budget Act. The Chair announced that the disposition of the point of order would be resolved by the question of consideration of H. Res. 436. The House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on the point of order at the end of which the Chair will put the question on consideration as the statutory means of disposing of the point of order.
Mr. McGovern moved on consideration of the resolution.
On consideration of the resolution. Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 140).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 436.
On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 141).
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 217 - 212 (Roll no. 142). (text: CR H2220)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.