SB2882Introduced in the Senate
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026
Introduced by Patty Murray, District WA
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Checking for a plain-English summary…
Official description
A bill making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.
Where it stands
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having voted on the prevailing side, the vote by which the third cloture motion on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 557) entered in Senate.
October 9, 2025
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed S. 2882 RC# 557 · October 9, 2025
47
Yes
50
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
100 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Jim Banks | IN-3 | No |
| Lisa Murkowski | AK | No |
| Dan Sullivan | AK | No |
| Tommy Tuberville | AL | No |
| Katie Boyd Britt | AL | No |
| John Boozman | AR | No |
| Tom Cotton | AR | No |
| Ruben Gallego | AZ | Yes |
| Mark Kelly | AZ | Yes |
| Adam Schiff | CA | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Considered read the second time.
Under the order of 9/18/2025 considered read the third time.
Failed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Under the order of 9/18/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 45. Record Vote Number: 527.
Under the order of 9/18/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 45. Record Vote Number: 527.
Motion to reconsider by Senator Schumer, under the order of 9/19/2025 not having voted on the prevailing side, the vote by which S. 2882 failed of passage (Record Vote No. 527) entered in Senate. (consideration: CR S6785)
Under the order of 9/19/2025, the third reading was vitiated. (CR S6785)
Ordered placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 167.
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S6842)
Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S6842)
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate.
Motion to proceed to consideration of the motion to reconsider the vote by which S. 2882 failed of passage (Record Vote No. 527) agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider the vote by which S. 2882 failed of passage (Record Vote No. 527) agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Failed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Upon reconsideration, under the order of 9/18/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 534.
Upon reconsideration, under the order of 9/18/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 534.
Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 536.
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider, under the order of 10/1/2025, not having voted on the prevailing side, the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 536) entered in Senate.
Motion to proceed to consideration of the motion to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 536) agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 536) agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Upon reconsideration, cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 52. Record Vote Number: 542.
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S6931)
Second cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S6931)
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate. (consideration: CR S6936)
Second cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 45 - 50. Record Vote Number: 544. (CR S6951)
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider, under the order of 10/6/2025, not having voted on the prevailing side, the vote by which the second cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 544) entered in Senate.
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S6989)
Third cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S6989)
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate.
Motion to proceed to consideration of the motion to reconsider the vote by which the second cloture on the motion to proceed to the S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 544) agreed to in Senate by Voice Vote.
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider the vote by which the second cloture on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 544) in Senate by Voice Vote.
Upon reconsideration, the second cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 550.
Third cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 557. (CR S7051)
Motion by Senator Schumer to reconsider, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having voted on the prevailing side, the vote by which the third cloture motion on the motion to proceed to S. 2882 was not invoked (Record Vote No. 557) entered in Senate.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.