HB1271Introduced in the House of Delegates
Health insurance; pharmacy benefits managers; requirements and prohibited conduct.
Introduced by Otto Wachsmann, District 83
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Health insurance; pharmacy benefits managers; requirements and prohibited conduct; retail pharmacy network access standards; enforcement; civil penalty. Amends the definition of "pharmacy benefits management" to exclude certain activities and amends certain provisions related to prohibited conduct by health carriers and pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs). The bill prohibits a health carrier or PBM from denying a pharmacy the opportunity to participate in a network at preferred status if the pharmacy is willing to accept the same terms and conditions as other pharmacies that receive preferred status. The bill prohibits a health carrier or PBM from retroactively denying or reducing reimbursement for a covered service claim, except in certain circumstances. The bill also prohibits health carriers and PBMs from failing to make a payment due to a pharmacy or pharmacist upon termination from a network and from charging a pharmacist or pharmacy a fee related to participation in a PBM's network. Under the bill, no PBM shall restrict a pharmacy from informing an individual of any differential between the individual's out-of-pocket costs and the amount the individual would pay to purchase the drug directly or through the individual's health insurance coverage. The bill also requires PBMs to establish and maintain an electronic claim inquiry processing system using national standards to provide certain disclosures and to maintain records of network development activities. The bill prohibits a PBM from including the name of any pharmacy or hospital in any material issued by the PBM unless it lists all pharmacies participating in the preferred and nonpreferred pharmacy and health networks. Under the bill, the Attorney General is authorized to issue civil investigative demands regarding violations of the provisions of the bill and to bring an action in circuit court to enjoin any violation of such provisions. If the court finds that a person has willfully violated the provisions of the bill, the Attorney General may assess a civil penalty of up to 5,000 per violation.
Where it stands
Left in Labor and Commerce
February 18, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
House of DelegatesStage: Subcommittee recommends striking from the docket (9-Y 0-N) · February 10, 2026
9
Yes
0
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
9 delegates recorded in this House of Delegates vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each delegate voted
| Delegate | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Sullivan | 6 | Yes |
| Irene Shin | 8 | Yes |
| Laura Jane Cohen | 15 | Yes |
| Michelle Maldonado | 20 | Yes |
| J.J. Singh | 26 | Yes |
| Jason Ballard | 42 | Yes |
| Israel O'Quinn | 44 | Yes |
| Terry Kilgore | 45 | Yes |
| Rae Cousins | 79 | Yes |
Bill history
Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26101229D
Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce
Assigned HCL sub: Subcommittee #1
Subcommittee recommends striking from the docket (9-Y 0-N)
Left in Labor and Commerce
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.