← All Virginia bills

HB906Introduced in the House of Delegates

Energy load flexibility protocols; SCC et al., to evaluate high electric demand customers, report.

Introduced

Introduced by Richard Sullivan, District 6

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.

Official description

State Corporation Commission; work group; energy load flexibility protocols; high electric demand customers; report. Directs the State Corporation Commission to convene a work group to evaluate and assess energy load flexibility protocols for high electric demand customers, including any commercial or industrial customer located in the Commonwealth with an electricity demand of greater than 50 megawatts. In conducting its assessment, the work group shall consider factors as outlined in the bill, provide an analysis of the current regulatory framework in the Commonwealth regarding high electric demand customers, and develop recommendations for improving load flexibility protocols and demand response management programs by electric utilities or the regional transmission entity. The work group shall include members as outlined in the bill and shall submit a report of its findings and recommendations by November 1, 2026. This bill is a recommendation of the Commission on Electric Utility Regulation.

Where it stands

Continued to next session in Rules (Voice Vote)

February 6, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

No recorded vote is available for this bill yet.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

Bill history

  1. Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26102101D

  2. Referred to Committee on Rules

  3. Assigned HRUL sub: Studies Subcommittee

  4. Fiscal Impact Statement from State Corporation Commission (HB906)

  5. Subcommittee recommends continuing to (Voice Vote)

  6. Continued to next session in Rules (Voice Vote)

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.