SB359Introduced in the Senate
Health care; decision-making, end of life, penalties.
Introduced by Jennifer Boysko, District 38
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Health care; decision-making; end of life; penalties. Allows an adult diagnosed with a terminal disease to request and an attending health care provider to prescribe self-administered aid in dying medication for the purpose of ending the patient's life. The bill requires that a patient's request for self-administered aid in dying medication to end his life be given orally on two occasions and in writing, signed by the patient and one witness, and that the patient be given an express opportunity to rescind his request at any time. The bill makes it a Class 2 felony (i) to willfully and deliberately alter, forge, conceal, or destroy a patient's request, or rescission of request, for self-administered aid in dying medication to end his life with the intent and effect of causing the patient's death; (ii) to coerce, intimidate, or exert undue influence on a patient to request self-administered aid in dying medication for the purpose of ending his life or to destroy the patient's rescission of such request with the intent and effect of causing the patient's death; or (iii) to coerce, intimidate, or exert undue influence on a patient to forgo self-administered aid in dying medication for the purpose of ending the patient's life. The bill also grants immunity from civil or criminal liability and professional disciplinary action to any person who complies with the provisions of the bill and allows health care providers to refuse to participate in the provision of self-administered aid in dying medication to a patient for the purpose of ending the patient's life.
Where it stands
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB359)
February 5, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Failed to report from Education and Health with amendments (7-Y 8-N) · February 5, 2026
7
Yes
8
No
0
Absent or Not Voting
15 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chris Head | 3 | No |
| David Suetterlein | 4 | No |
| Todd Pillion | 6 | No |
| Mark Peake | 8 | No |
| Lashrecse Aird | 13 | No |
| Lamont Bagby | 14 | Yes |
| Schuyler VanValkenburg | 16 | No |
| Louise Lucas | 18 | Yes |
| Christie New Craig | 19 | No |
| Mamie Locke | 23 | Yes |
Bill history
Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26105032D
Referred to Committee on Education and Health
Fiscal Impact statement From VCSC (1/20/2026 1:39 pm)
Assigned Education sub: Health
Senate subcommittee amendments offered
Failed to report from Education and Health with amendments (7-Y 8-N)
Fiscal Impact Statement from Department of Planning and Budget (SB359)
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.