← All Virginia bills

SB651Introduced in the Senate

Underground electric distribution & transmission improvement; levy on utility customers by ordinance.

Engrossed

Introduced by Russet Perry, District 31

What does this bill do?

Plain-English breakdown

Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.

Official description

Qualifying localities; underground electric distribution and transmission improvements; levy on utility customers by ordinance. Authorizes a qualifying locality, defined in the bill, to enter into an agreement with an electric utility to place new or proposed underground electric distribution or transmission lines and facilities or to relocate or convert existing overhead electric distribution or transmission lines and facilities underground. The bill requires any such agreement to provide that the locality pay to the utility its full additional costs of placing new or proposed electric distribution or transmission lines in the qualifying locality or relocating and converting that portion of a line located in the county underground rather than overhead, minus the net of relocation credits.The bill also provides that the qualifying locality may impose an additional levy on electric utility customers, which (i) shall not exceed $1 per month on residential customers; (ii) shall not exceed $10 per month on nonresidential customers; (iii) may be fixed at any amount on nonresidential customers that are major commercial energy consumers, defined in the bill; and (iv) shall be collected by the utility on behalf of the locality.

Where it stands

Failed to Pass from conference

March 14, 2026

How did lawmakers vote?

House of Delegates votes

3 recorded votes · each counted separately

Senate votes

5 recorded votes · each counted separately

SenateStage: Senate acceded to request (40-Y 0-N 0-A) · March 12, 2026

40

Yes

0

No

0

Absent or Not Voting

40 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.

What do people think?

Citizen Voice

How would you vote on this bill?

An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.

One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.

See how each senator voted

Bill history

  1. Prefiled and ordered printed; Offered 01-14-2026 26105147D

  2. Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor

  3. Fiscal Impact statement From TAX (1/31/2026 8:22 am)

  4. Senate committee offered

  5. Reported from Commerce and Labor with amendments (11-Y 4-N)

  6. Rules suspended

  7. Constitutional reading dispensed Block Vote (on 1st reading) (40-Y 0-N 0-A)

  8. Passed by for the day Block Vote (Voice Vote)

  9. Read second time

  10. Commerce and Labor Amendments agreed to

  11. Engrossed by Senate as amended (Voice Vote)

  12. Read third time and passed Senate (22-Y 17-N 0-A)

  13. Placed on Calendar

  14. Read first time

  15. Referred to Committee on Labor and Commerce

  16. Assigned HCL sub: Subcommittee #3

  17. Fiscal Impact statement From TAX (2/21/2026 3:41 pm)

  18. House subcommittee offered

  19. Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (6-Y 3-N)

  20. Reported from Labor and Commerce with substitute (14-Y 7-N)

  21. Committee substitute printed 26109186D-H1

  22. Read second time

  23. Passed by for the day

  24. Read third time

  25. committee substitute agreed to

  26. Engrossed by House - committee substitute

  27. Passed House with substitute (63-Y 35-N 0-A)

  28. House substitute rejected by Senate (0-Y 40-N 0-A)

  29. House insisted on substitute

  30. House requested conference committee

  31. Senate acceded to request (40-Y 0-N 0-A)

  32. Conferees appointed by Senate

  33. Senate Conferees: Perry, Marsden, McDougle

  34. Conferees appointed by House

  35. House Conferees: Singh, Sullivan, O'Quinn

  36. Senate acceded to request

  37. No further action taken

  38. Failed to Pass from conference

  39. Failed to Pass from conference

Verify the information

Our commitment to neutrality

We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.