SB5510Introduced in the Senate
Concerning conservation district revenue limitations.
Introduced by Sharon Shewmake, District 42
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
Concerning conservation district revenue limitations.
Where it stands
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
January 12, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Committee on Ways & Means: 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass · February 13, 2025
19
Yes
1
No
3
Absent or Not Voting
23 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus Riccelli | 003A | Yes |
| Derek Stanford | 1 | Yes |
| Matt Boehnke | 8 | Not Voting |
| Mark Schoesler | 9 | Yes |
| Ron Muzzall | 10 | Yes |
| Robert Hasegawa | 11 | Not Voting |
| Judith Warnick | 13 | Yes |
| Nikki Torres | 15 | Not Voting |
| Perry Dozier | 16 | Yes |
| Drew Hansen | 23 | Yes |
Bill history
First reading, referred to Ways & Means.
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 4:00 PM.
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Ways & Means at 4:00 PM.
WM - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
Minority; do not pass.
Minority; without recommendation.
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
Senate Rules "X" file.
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.