S2769Introduced in the Senate
Establishes minimum limitations standards for structural property damage claims, and voids any policy provision, endorsement, condition, limitation, agreement, or claim practice that shortens those standards.
Introduced by Brian Thompson, District 20
What does this bill do?
Plain-English breakdown
Writing a plain-English summary of this bill… this can take a few seconds the first time.
Official description
INSURANCE -- FIRE INSURANCE POLICIES AND RESERVES - Establishes minimum limitations standards for structural property damage claims, and voids any policy provision, endorsement, condition, limitation, agreement, or claim practice that shortens those standards.
Where it stands
Committee recommended measure be held for further study
March 31, 2026
How did lawmakers vote?
SenateStage: Senate Committee on Commerce: Be held for further study · March 31, 2026
10
Yes
0
No
1
Absent or Not Voting
11 senators recorded in this Senate vote. Colors show vote categories only, not whether a vote was good or bad.
What do people think?
Citizen Voice
How would you vote on this bill?
An unofficial public opinion poll. It does not affect the bill or the official vote.
One response per device. Location is self-reported and not verified. Results are informal and not a scientific survey.
See how each senator voted
| Senator | District | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Stefano Famiglietti | 4 | Yes |
| Samuel Bell | 5 | Yes |
| Tiara Mack | 6 | Yes |
| Meghan Kallman | 15 | Yes |
| Robert Britto | 18 | Yes |
| Ryan Pearson | 19 | Yes |
| David Tikoian | 22 | Absent |
| Hanna Gallo | 27 | Yes |
| Elaine Morgan | 34 | Yes |
| Susan Sosnowski | 37 | Yes |
Bill history
Introduced, referred to Senate Commerce
Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (03/31/2026)
Committee recommended measure be held for further study
Verify the information
Our commitment to neutrality
We provide factual information only. We never tell you which politicians or bills to support, and we do not rank, score, or endorse anyone.